Once upon a time I divulged to some comrades that I was attracted to someone because :
- he has impeccable manners
- he is extremely polite (pretty similar to previous point)
- appears to be very considerate of others (again related to previous points)
- has the ability to be very captivating with his 'convo' game. That is to say whatever agenda his conversation embarks on is very illustrative of the character he is, leading on to my next point...
- kind hearted. (reiterates one, two and three)
I am a SUCKER for manners. Good manners to be explicit and leave no room for ambiguity, BAD MANNERS are social vomit.
Anyway, so comrade 'Essex' asked
- what was he wearing?
- what is his job?
- does he drive?
- what is his future goal (career wise)?
To the first que, I could only vaguely recall his attire. I didnt see the relevence. Even if the person wore a flamboyant orange recycling sac, i wouldnt be deterred if the person possessed those particular assets, I reckon such a choice would even add more stimuli to the ever entertaining show of the wordsmith. The second point I was unable to confidently describe the occupation where he currently invests his time. The third was a 'No' and the last I had a good general idea of his ambition..
Basically I am not sure what is the more absurd viewpoint. Same Difference really??!!
Some people need to get a bloody grip! Is that the make or break qualities you would want in someone? I feel embarrassed for humanity sometimes
ReplyDeleteLol, according to some those qualities are the first hurdle to tackle. because 'how can you be attracted to someone who looks crap (dress wise). in some respects this is a valid point, I would be put off by someone who wore leggings for example...or had a plastic hairband wth a bow.
ReplyDelete